Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Vulnerable Populations


          My initial reaction to the article “Funding healthy society helps cure health care” was that of astonishment. As we continue learning through the nursing program and of the importance of patient health history, it is hard for me to think of this as a common problem physicians overlook.
           The article discussed multiple diagnostic testing done for a young patient whose “abdominal pain” was nothing more than hunger. We know through the review of systems that nutrition is an essential role that leads to diagnosing a problem. The NY Times piece that discussed the issues of overlooking the social effects of health is a major problem indeed. New ways of teaching must be instilled in both healthcare workers and in turn to members of the community. A point should be stressed that although testing and imaging provides many answers, it is important to look at all aspects that could have brought the patient there to begin with. Physicians are often overworked and primary care doctors have become a shortage, time and money plays a large role for the way things have become. The hundreds and possibly thousands of dollars spent on this one child for testing could have been put to better use to treat the cause and not just the illness. Impoverished and underserved families are not being educated or directed on what they need to support a healthy lifestyle. Health Lead is a great community intervention that involves college students pursing healthcare to volunteer and practice teaching the importance of preventing illness and is a type of upstream thinking instead of simply treating the illness. In this effort, we as nurses can address community health issues before they become a problem.
           Poverty puts individuals and families at a higher health risk. The environment they live in may not be suitable for optimal health. Living in dirty, small, densely populated areas encourages bacterial growth and heightened disease transmission. Due to lower socioeconomic status, people living in poverty are limited in resources which put them at a knowledge deficit about health risks. Education on nutrition, exercise, sanitation and general healthy living choices must become known to families a
nd individuals who have not had the basic understanding of what health can mean to them and to their community. Poverty makes a community vulnerable to health risks. People living in poverty cannot seek healthcare when they are sick and when they can’t receive care, they are risking exposing the community to illness. Children in the community are greatly affected by the health risks poverty can bring. Children who are not raised with healthy decisions are more susceptible to obesity and can have the foreseeable consequences of unprotected sex and STD transmission among other health issues if they are not being taught healthy living choices.
         Two great interventions to educate impoverished communities involve outreach and referral and follow-up. Outreach programs such as food banks and health safety services to low income families and communities can go a long way to a better way of living. Like Health Lead, reaching out to families about basic nutrition and exercise and referring them to places where they can receive the materials they need, will reflect opportunities of healthy living. With more effort put into these types of interventions, we can hope to have fewer health problems and have visits to the doctor be only for checkups to observe improvement.   


Nies, M.S. & McEwen, M. (2011). Community/public health nursing: promoting the health of populations
          (5th ed.) St. Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier

6 comments:

  1. Emily,

    I really enjoyed reading your information about this vulnerable population. I definitely agree with your ideas regarding upstream thinking. I personally believe that this leads to many of the problems we have in our healthcare system today. I also thought you made a valid connection about how physicians tend to focus on diagnosing and treating a single problem instead of evaluating the entire patient and treating the underlying cause(s).

    The way you pointed out how children are especially affected by poverty got me thinking. Children are so innocent and depend greatly on those around them. In the article Upstream Thinking about Promoting Healthy Environments in School, Denehy thoroughly describes the analogy of “upstream thinking” in regards to the health of children. He discussed a community that developed downstream because there was a vast amount of people needed to rescue all those that fell into the river of illness. He then says that one day someone wondered why there were so many people falling into the river and decided to go upstream to find out. He then goes on to discuss how children carry behaviors learned during childhood with them throughout their entire life. The lack of education about how to lead a healthy life, along with the lack of physical activity and the use of alcohol or tobacco, to name a few, contributes to long term health problems including osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. If more of an effort was made in “upstream thinking”, it would benefit everyone down the road, and I strongly believe this is the direction that all healthcare workers need to be headed in.

    Denehy, J. (2001). Thinking upstream about promoting healthy environments in schools. 17(2), 61-63. Retrieved from http://jsn.sagepub.com/content/17/2/61.short?patientinform-links=yes&legid=spjsn;17/2/61

    ReplyDelete
  2. Emily, nicely written blog and coverage on the many issues that are apart of vulnerable populations. This is can be a difficult topic to understand, let alone write on because there are so many things that can contribute to poverty. There are also so many aspects in a person’s life that poverty affects in the moment, and can contribute to their futures, which is why it is so critical to intervene early. We know by the example in our country, that sometimes this can be hard to execute. How should health care be done? Where is that line that is the cut off for low income salaries? Who is able to fund these types of interventions?
    I really enjoyed the NY times article because the response and the answer to these people’s needs were so simple. We need to be able to offer or prescribe the basic needs that a person requires like food, water, shelter. It was so neat that Health Lead also would hook them up with then further resources like food banks. What so inspiring is that it consisted of college students just like us! It just shows that anyone can take a role in public health and make a difference in the people’s lives in their own community, and in turn inspire others to do the same! As Courtney had mention and, included interventions you suggested, upstream thinking is the solution to this situation! Treating not just the problem but the underlying core issue will help us do so. Health Education is wise and helpful at a young age because we can help kids understand why maintaining a healthy lifestyle can be so beneficial currently, and in their futures. Not only nutrition is helpful but making sure people get a well-rounded education in all subjects. Unfortunately, we all know that not all of life’s curve balls can be prevented, so providing emotional support and resources can help people deal with their situation. Education in this area would additionally prepare someone before or after life events occur.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Emily,
    I agree with your initial reaction when reading this article. I think if the physician is thorough they should touch on every possible problem, but many times they are in a hurry and have more patients to see or some other commitment. I also don’t think that physicians are taught to think any other way than strictly medically; very technical. So yes, new ways of teaching is necessary. If teaching varied and physicians took their time many dollars could be saved and many diagnoses could me made faster. I think that Health Lead provides many college students with unique opportunities to gain more experience in the field.

    It’s sad that children growing up in poverty have a higher health risk, have a harder time in school, and are more likely to take a wrong path later in life. When people are poorer they don’t have access to health care, they aren’t able to buy the healthier choices or any food at all, and so much more. I like that you thought out of the box for interventions. Education is essential as well as outreach. I like that you added in referral and follow-up. These vulnerable populations need to be guided and by referring them you are doing just that. By following up with them you are ensuring their success.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I appreciate you pointing out the upstream way of thinking that sets the Health Lead team apart from the rest of the health care system. This is a very beneficial volunteer group that is making the necessary strides towards providing patients the resources necessary to improve their health and stop health crises before they happen. I agree that it is pertinent as nurses to focus on addressing community health problems before they become a problem. Just think of all the money we could save and put to better use if physicians, such as the one from the article, did not have to run numerous tests for a patient who was suffering from hunger but could instead refer that child to a food pantry.

    You also mention that these people living in poverty have a knowledge deficit in regards to health risks, and this immediately made me consider Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. If a person is struggling to meet their basic needs such as food, shelter, and safety they are not going to be worried about education. As nurses we use outreach to help provide these families with basic needs so that they may be ready to learn better health practices. In my opinion, it is important that these two practices go hand in hand in order to make education more effective.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Emily, I thought you did a wonderful job talking about vulnerable populations. It’s hard for me to take a step back and put myself into the shoes of someone without food, water, shelter etc. As you mentioned, many physicians may not fully treat patients for the reason they come to the doctor’s in the first place. I can’t imagine going to the doctor’s office and having them run a bunch of tests on me and giving me a quick solution/ medicine over helping me to deal with the real (overall) problem. I think that nurses can have an impact on helping to change how vulnerable populations are treated as a whole.

    I really liked how you mentioned Health Lead. Especially since we are current college students, a program like this is an excellent way to feed into upstream thinking. I remember last semester when we did our teaching learning project, it was very rewarding to be able to share valuable information with a group of people. I think that it would be a great opportunity to put those skills to use and participate in Health Lead. Overall, I agree with you that upstream thinking is the way to approach dealing with vulnerable populations and health care. Looking for ways to treat the overall cause and not just the illness that was caused from bacteria in an impoverished area will give long-term health to individuals and communities as a whole. Finally, I think that we as nurses should continue to advocate our patient. If we suspect they are coming to the physician’s office and are only getting “short-term” treatment, I think it is appropriate to advocate and collaborate with a team to come up with a better-suited plan for the patient.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Emily,

    I enjoyed reading your post about vulnerable populations but once again was astonished at the prevalence of poverty and hunger. As future healthcare providers, it is something we need to be aware of and take the time to treat the person as a whole. So much of medicine is providing a downstream approach. We need to take the upstream approach when appropriate and provide the resources and education to provide good health and nutrition to everyone.

    Oregon is one of the hungriest states in the nation and Upstream Public Health works to make quality, healthy food easy to get, cheaper, and available to everyone. They provide efforts to make sure decision makers consider the health and equality impacts of food and nutrition. Currently, they are participants in the Farm to School program that ensures that more Oregon produced and processed foods are available in schools. They also are exploring options to decrease the amount of soda consumption, which is showing to be a contributing factor in obesity and diabetes. Addtionally, the organization has partnered with the federal front to conduct a “Health Impact Assessment” examing how stronger nutritional standards on snacks and drinks sold in schools might affect the health of the student and the finances of the school (Upstream, n.d.).

    Taking this upstream approach is a positive approach to vulnerable populations and ensuring good health for all. A similar approach may also work for the vulnerable populations of Wisconsin. As nurses we need to continue to advocate for these approaches to commit to a more long-term preventative approach to healthcare. After all, “Good health is the foundation for any person seeking to reach their highest potential. Good health increases access to continuous employment and academic success. Good health minimizes our risk of preventable illnesses. Everyone deserves the opportunity to become the best person they can be” (Upstream, n.d.).

    Reference

    Upstream Public Health (n.d). Food & Nutrition. Retrieved from http://www.upstreampublichealth.org/issues/food-nutrition

    ReplyDelete